Talk:En attendant Cousteau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The title

An allusion to Waiting for Godot? 80.202.25.17 15:17, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Title Track / En Attendant Cousteau

The title track mentioned in the article and En Attendant Cousteau, mentioned later, are one and the same. Both descriptions cannot be correct. Crossbottle (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011

Since

Allmusic
}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 17:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"lack of space on the formats"

"On vinyl and cassette tape the title track was edited to only 22 minutes due to the lack of space on the formats." On cassette? Seriously? The record company did now know that 100 and 120 minute tapes were in production? The title track would fit entirely on side B, if there were proper lenght of tape used.

Might be worth mentioning in more polite manner.

83.13.239.255 (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the tape was really long the first side would have a twenty-minute silent gap after the first three tracks. It wouldn't have worked. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on En attendant Cousteau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]