Talk:Encyclopedia of Chicago/GA1
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 18:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):): c (OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Notes
- 1 image: Fair use with good rationale.
- Good use of {{Inflation}}
- I did some copyedits to clear up some of the language
- I made all the 4-digit number consistent per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Delimiting (grouping of digits)
- There is no critical reception. The article mentions that reviews of the book were done (ie. WSJ) but doesn't say what the reviewers wrote about it.