Talk:Evacuate Earth

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) on 12 May 2022.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

This stub has some serious issues...the author/creator is reading a lot into this article without substantial citations or context, and speaking of context, the article itself is little more than a frame, and a poorly written one at that. If it can't be substantially improved, I'm voting for its removal as it conveys little informative value. 66.103.112.145 (talk) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC).--66.103.112.145 (talk) 02:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This has the most subjective content ever in the history of Wikipedia 140.0.229.26 (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This comment was made one year ago. Much of astrophysics is also subjective! -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 02:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Headline-1: Russia plans to colonize moon by 2030, report says -- Published May 08, 2014

• http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/05/08/russia-plans-to-colonize-moon-by-2030-report-says/

QUOTE: "A report in the Russian-language newspaper Izvestia Thursday said the nation is planning to put a manned colony on the moon as soon as 2030, and is racing to dispatch the first robotic rovers to explore the lunar surface two years from now, according to The Moscow Times." -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC) -- PS:FYI for future editing.[reply]

Headline-2: These People Want to Go to Mars (and Never Come Back)

• http://www.space.com/22616-mars-one-martian-colony-volunteers.html

QUOTE: "The Mars One mission aims to send humans on a one-way trip to the Red Planet. The mission aims to land the first Mars colonists on the planet by 2023." -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC) -- PS:FYI for future editing.[reply]

Headline-3: Mars One's Red Planet Colony Project (Gallery) -- [20 pictures]

• http://www.space.com/20165-mars-one-colony-images.html

QUOTE: "Mars One plans to launch an unmanned supply mission in January 2016. It will land that October with more than 5,000 pounds of food or other supplies." -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC) -- PS:FYI for future editing.[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evacuate Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141020122423/http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/episodes/evacuate-earth to http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/episodes/evacuate-earth/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]