Talk:Ewelme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}} The coordinates need the following fixes:

The position for Ewelme, Oxfordshire is very wrong. It's position should be: 51.615991,-1.070309 not near leicester - thanks for this great service 82.25.68.25 (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looked pretty close to me - I tried your co-ords above, and it put me in the middle of the ocean. I have adjusted them slightly though, to better match with Google Maps. Avicennasis @ 15:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The co-ordinates were roughly correct, as verified by the location map in the infobox. Avicennasis's "fix" placed the location dot way off the map, which should have been a clue that this was not a "fix" at all. In fact it moved Ewelme from Oxfordshire two counties away to somewhere south of Basingstoke. Simply looking at a real Ordnance Survey map marked with real degrees and minutes with would also indicate that the former co-ordinates were roughly right and Avicennasis's "fix" was way off. I have therefore reverted Avicennasis's edit. Motacilla (talk) 22:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ewelme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]