Talk:Exarchate of the Philippines

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Eastern Orthodoxy This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This edit chenged a number 3 to a number 7, without disturbing the previously cited source which had been said to support the number 3. I looked briefly at the source, and I don't see how it supports either number. WTF?????? -- Boracay Bill (talk) 12:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had to excise a portion of the article because it used as it's only source another Wiki. Remember, wikis are almost always deemed unreliable sources because of their open editing standards. Pairadox (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked ref. No 5 (Miltiadis Adamopoulos) and I got the "Page not found" message. What happened? The "Orthodox Wiki" has a similar reference that doesn't work either. The Orth. Wiki article says something about Greeks and "Macedonians" in the Philippines since the 17th century. Is this correct or biased by contemporary geopolitics? Who was "Macedonian" at that time?
Any way, does anybody know where can I find the Milton Adamson book?Kentavros (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The website which hosted that page moved or deleted it. A copy was available in internet archives, though. I've fixed the link to upoint to the archived copy. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the links were not working and so I removed them when I created the Parishes and Chapels section. I am not sure it's necessary to have all these various references. Perhaps just having them listed as external links would be good enough. Besides, I find them all very distracting when reading the article. I hope that I was able to put the references next to what they are supposed to support. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]