Talk:Extremis

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Extremis after Stark Disassembled?

"Tony later discovered that his brain still had access to Extremis, which he began using again." This part is in non if the comics I know off. The Bleeding Edge Armor works in many ways different and it was mentioned nowhere that Tony regained the use of Extremis abilities. --212.185.31.125 (talk) 13:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

The claim that Extremis armor will appear in Iron Man 2 has no references or sources. Not only that, a casual interview between Favreau and Ain'tItCoolNews suggests that Favreau does not like the idea of the Extremis armor. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/36491 This next part is just my opinion, but I'd like to suggest that any similarities in appearance are just similarities in appearance until the contrary has been proven. 70.254.195.238 (talk) 07:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC) GuestEditorZyxtuv[reply]

Complete Nonsense

90% of this article bears no resemblance to reality whatsoever. The Extremis arc was never meant to reboot the Iron Man character, nor was it intended to be an "new origin" as the article claims. The entire Extremis arc takes place completely within main Iron Man continuity. Seriously, did the person that wrote this even read the arc? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.33.202.98 (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Actually that is wrong. Before Extremis Tony was wounded in Vietnam or Korea before that, the new origin is the part about Afghanistan. Thje article didn't suggest anything else. --212.185.31.125 (talk) 13:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ellipses within brackets?

I'm concerned about this paragraph:

This is similar for Adi Granov: "My first official introduction to the character occurred a year prior to Extremis. [...] Upon reading the script, I realized how realistic Warren's approach was to the story. [...] When illustrating the book I wanted my art to mirror the realism in Warren's writing [...] I felt that Warren wrote a story that's a sort of techno-thriller action story and I wanted the art to reflect this. [...] I saw Iron Man as not just a superhero in a suit; rather he is a pilot or weapon. To me, the Iron Man armor is more akin to a jetfighter than it is to an outfit.

Look how ugly that is! And it's all the fault of those ellipses within brackets.

Here is my question: Is that even a legitimate thing? Or is it something that developed on the Internet among the semi-literate, as a sort of over-compensation? I don't recall ever seeing "[...]" in a newspaper or other major publication; "..." always seemed to suffice. (Personally, I prefer the dots be spaced out . . . but as good as it looks, it doesn't catch on.)

Even if ellipses within brackets have a legitimate place, I'm positive they're being used wrong here.

--Ben Culture (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extremis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304145337/http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=128887 to http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=128887

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]