Talk:Fairey Albacore

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / Maritime / British / Canadian / European / North America / World War II Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Maritime warfare task force British military history task force Canadian military history task force European military history task force North American military history task force World War II task force

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fairey Albacore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201155942/http://my-malta.com/interesting/barker/thomasbarker01.html to http://my-malta.com/interesting/barker/thomasbarker01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article does suggest that the Albacore was a failure in that "despite the intention" of replacing the Swordfish (which was a frontline torpedo-bomber at the time of the Albacore's introduction), the newer aircraft was "retired before it". The two biplanes are described as having been replaced by two monoplanes; the Barracuda and the Avenger.

But what the article does not really make entirely clear to me in the opening is whether or not the Swordfish was successfully replaced by the Albacore in the FAA as a frontline torpedo bomber with the fleet aircraft carriers, with the Albacore serving in that role while the Swordfish was relegated to secondary roles such as reconnaissance & A/S work operating from escort carriers. It would make sense that the existing frontline torpedo bombers in the FAA would be replaced ASAP by the faster and more versatile Barracuda as it became available, but were these purely Albacore squadrons by then, or did they still include Swordfish squadrons at that date? If the former case, then it would hardly be seen as a slight on the Albacore nor cause it to be adjudicated a failure. Meanwhile the almost STOL-like Swordfish could continue in auxiliary ops from CVEs until replaced by the highly versatile Avenger as enough of these became available (so as to make continued use of the veteran biplane a redundancy).

But is this what happened? I don't know from reading this article's opening paragraph. Can we clarify whether the Swordfish actually outlived the 'intended replacement' Albacore in its intended primary role of fleet torpedo-bomber or not? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:15:2911:E6E:65EC (talk) 22:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Hayes factory producing the Albacore had to cease production order to convert the factory over to building Fireflys. Fairey had ceased production of the Swordfish prior to starting serial production of the Albacore, but Blackburn was contracted to continue production of the Swordfish after Fairey ceased production. Blackburn continued Swordfish production until 1944, and these aircraft were used in secondary roles, primarily for ASW work on Escort Aircraft Carriers. It is true that Albacores replaced the Swordfish on fleet aircraft carriers and continued in that role until 1943, long after the Swordfish was relegated to ASW duty. The Albacore was a superior aircraft to the Swordfish and would have been better suited, even to the ASW role, but it would have been to costly to build another factory just for the Albacore, when the Swordfish, although an inferior aircraft in almost every respect, was 'good enough' for the ASW role, and much cheaper to build. The Albacore, with it's constant speed prop, and much more powerful engine actually had somewhat better STOL characteristics than the Swordfish. I'll do some more research and propose some edits to the article in a few days.Damwiki1 (talk) 03:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]