Talk:Fiber art

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Textile Arts High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Craft Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Craft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of craft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CraftWikipedia:WikiProject CraftTemplate:WikiProject CraftCraft articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. Smithsonian Institution: Archives of American Art Low‑importance This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Archives of American Art.

The most-cited reference, Mark Gertlein, is most likely Mark Getlein, who wrote several books with a common "Living with Art" title. However, without knowing the exact book and edition it is not possible to improve the citations.--

This page does not seem to cover a fashion industry view of what 'textile design' means. --Jane McCann (talk) 15:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

]

File:Grande Diaframma, Enrico Accatino, arazzo.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Grande Diaframma, Enrico Accatino, arazzo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Grande Diaframma, Enrico Accatino, arazzo.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- talk) 16:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Expansion

I expanded this quite a bit today, adding a "history" section, but am hoping for some feedback and continued work on examples after the 1980s. It would be wonderful to get an even better sense of the art historical context from someone with greater expertise in this area. I'd be glad to continue collaborating on this if anyone is interested. Craft art and artists are often sadly neglected on Wikipedia--like a lot of the visual arts, I guess. Sarasays (talk) 21:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiber art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106042857/http://fiberarts.com/ to http://www.fiberarts.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Modern craftivist is knowing as handicraft because people use it to crafting to protest or transmitted information when they protest."

How do I label this as a case of absence of clarity/"needs more info?" Thanks! 10000Dandelions (talk) 08:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]