Talk:FilmAffinity
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Popularity
They are popular [] according to the
Nielsen Ratings? I don't understand. Nielsen Ratings are for TV, as far as I know. Ben T/C 03:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
]
hai sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.101.67.39 (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
FilmAffinity → Filmaffinity – Filmaffinity is correct. See picture. Thanks.--777sms (talk) 23:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- MOS:TM.--Labattblueboy (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2013 (UTC)]
- "Filmaffinity" is better than "FilmAffinity" per the old CamelCase guidelines (which were changed to allow camelcasing) -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- MOS:TM. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
FilmAffinity
Is film affinity a reliable or reputable source for edits on Wikipedia. B.R. Esquivel 06:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BEBO1986 (talk • contribs)