Talk:Flight of the Butterflies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Assessment

Article incubation assessment

  1. Does the article establish
    notability
    of the subject ?
    A. It meets the
    general notability guideline
    :
    B. It meets any relevant
    subject specific guideline
    :
  2. Is it verifiable?
    A. It contains
    references to sources
    :
    B. There are
    reliable sources
    where necessary:
    C. There is no original research:
  3. Is it
    neutral
    ?
    A. It is a fair representation without bias:
    B. It is written in a non-
    promotional
    manner:
  4. It does not contain
    unverifiable speculation
    :
  5. Pass, Fail or Hold for three months:

Film is for children. Only.

Unlike other IMAX nature films, this has little for adults. There is nothing about monarchs outside North America. The plot focuses on humans, leaving very little said about insects. Pacing is very slow, suitable only for children and less educated adults. The Wiki page should give the reader a clue about this. 50.136.207.30 (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flight of the Butterflies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]