Talk:Fulla

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleFulla has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 29, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Fulla/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
here
for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Congratulations, the article meets all the GA criteria. Arsenikk (talk) 08:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa, I seemed to have missed this review. Sorry about that - thanks for the review! :bloodofox: (talk) 08:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]