Talk:Gangland (TV series)

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Whoever put the marker for speedy deletion needs to note the time that it was created. I created it and I am in the process of editing it. Actually, a great deal of content has already been added. Seantpainter 20:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 'history channel style' one, that's told like civil war documentary —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.40.155 (talk) 09:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

when r ya l going to do a show based on Denver ,colorado street gangs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.71.60 (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a History Channel forum.Leviathanlover (talk) 01:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The episode on the Vagos MC where they are discussing the history of motorcycle clubs in the U.S. they mention the Hollister "riots" they use the staged photos of a drunk on a bike who only arrived after the "riots" but his photo was still put on the front page of Life magazine as if that was what was happening. This was noted on an episode during boys toys on motorcycles. The guy didn't even ride bikes.

Has they done an episode about the Russian Mafia or Colombian Cartels? They aren't from USA but do opperate in the Us.

I'm suprised that there hasn't been an episode of the Mafia in the US esp any of the five crime families, one about Westies or Winter-hill gang would be cool too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.171.197.67 (talk) 08:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This show is often wildly inaccurate. I'm surprised that a controversy section is not included on the main page instead of just a history of episodes. Specifically their first and second episodes were full of absolutely wrong and inaccurate information relating to basing many of their so called facts on second hand and third hand sources of information as well as relying on testimony from well-established proven liars, for instance their softball & completely naive interview with frank lucas. Also misrepresenting and selectively editing video or stated statements from some of their interviewed 'guests' in that 1st episode about 'the brand'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.225.52 (talk) 20:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]