Talk:Gap Creek

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

The infobox and article should be about the first edition release, which would be the hardback version. There should be a sentence or two about the paperback, but by making the changes it makes it seem like the book came out in 2012 and then the reader would be confused how it could be selected for the Oprah Book Club in 1990 and how it could have sold 200 million copies in such a short time.

Even though the author does not have his own article, his information is not needed for this article. It does not help the reader's understanding of the book to know the information and awards/grants that are not related the book. Aspects (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gap Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714135808/http://m.salisburypost.com/article/20130414/SP04/130419849?template=mobile_story to http://m.salisburypost.com/article/20130414/SP04/130419849?template=mobile_story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]