Talk:Genealogy of Ankhefensekhmet

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Transcription/Transliteration

It would be nice if the source information for the translation could be included or referrenced. I am certain that the blocks do not say "Seti I", and "Amenhotep III", "Ahmose I". I am researching and learning this topic as deeply as I can as a personal interest. The discovery that this stella exists should answer certain questions I have in my mind about the placement of the 19th dynasty, but without being able to verify the actual names on the block this article may as well be hearsay. It is useless aside from being a statement that the genaology exists to anyone who verifies information before they take it as fact. 2600:1004:B230:1AE7:75F6:6F6F:406A:B179 (talk) 04:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]