Talk:Geography of Uruguay

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Uruguay Top‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Uruguayan geography. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Geography High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs

A controversy has erupted over the choice of map for this article. The two candidates are shown here, along with any others that other Wikipedians may choose to enter. Feel free to make any comments. The lower map may also appear in the corresponding Geography article for this country. Kelisi 16:54, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

See

This article, or large portions of it, appear to have been copied from Rex A. Hudson and Sandra W. Meditz, editors. Uruguay: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1990. (e.g., Climate for Geography of Uruguay#Climate, The Interior, Littoral, Greater Montevideo and Coast for Geography of Uruguay#Land use and settlement patterns)

Because the source is a U.S. Government publication, this does not appear to be a Wikipedia:Copyright violations problem. However, see the April 13, 2009 Wikipedia Signpost article titled Let's get serious about plagiarism and the proposed Wikipedia:Plagiarism giudeline. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 04:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey oh. I thought I'd add some images to this page, as geography pages + images = plusgood. I'm considering removing two items before adding 3/4 images from Commons. First is the "Political map of Uruguay" - redundant (two other maps already present), off-topic (art. not about political divisions), second is the top "Topics of Uruguay" temp. - this duplicates the bottom navbox, and takes up space that could be used for informative images. Any objections? The Interior (Talk) 19:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geography of Uruguay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203194404/http://www.ine.gub.uy/fase1new/Montevideo/Cuadro7_01.XLS to http://www.ine.gub.uy/fase1new/Montevideo/Cuadro7_01.XLS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ye Cool tina 5 (talk) 17:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]