Talk:Giants: Citizen Kabuto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Featured articleGiants: Citizen Kabuto is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 5, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 11, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
February 19, 2008Good article nomineeListed
March 25, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

The original game?

"It was based on the original PC game by Planet Moon Studios."
Which original game? I only played Giants a few times myself, so I'm not very knowledgable about it in general, and I always thought it was an original. Anyway, somebody that does know should add a link to the other game's Wiki page. Retodon8 08:43, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No clue what that is about - GCK is a stand-alone game. While the developers made no attempt to hide their desire to create a sequal, nothing came of it. Changed the first paragraph to reflect this, and to correct the "MS-DOS" statements. Also went ahead and changed the developer entry to point to Planet Moon Studios. If memory serves correctly, Digital Mayhem developed the PS2 version, rather than the original PC version. I could very well be wrong though, so feel free to call me on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.84.1 (talk • contribs)

The original version is in french... I think.92.81.34.134 (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Macintosh
version

I see no info on the Mac release date. It must have been

Scepia 21:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Save games?

I don't supose there were ever any user-made patches that allowed in-game saves? There's certainly none mentioned in the artical, but I'm sure I remember hearing about one years ago. Either way, I'm afraid I haven't found one yet.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.105.191.128 (talk • contribs)

There might be in the Macintosh version, but not the PC version. If it is indeed available in the MacOS version of the game, I highly doubt it is a result of a user created patch as the Mac Giants community is extremely decentralized and never really 'took off' to the same extent that the PC version's community did. I should note that I went ahead and pulled a rather major edit - Someone previously noted that the Mac and PC versions of the game worked together over the internet but this is entirely untrue due to the fact that the PC version utilizes DirectX for it's netcode which is not available on the MacOS. I also added a fairly long segment regarding the strives that the community has taken to mod the game.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.154.132 (talk • contribs)

Creative bundling

Anyone want to write up about the agreement to distribute with I think it was Creative Audigy cards (or it could have been Creative 3D cards - Gefore 4). I know I got my copy free with either mu Audigy or Creative Geforce 4 Ti4400. Would link to being a commercial success. Lonyo 00:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frontlines: Fuel of War is currently packaged with nVidia 9800 GT's. An advertising campaign does not a commercial success make. --Kingoomieiii ♣ Talk 16:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kabuto's Weak Spot

I'm kinda hesistant on whether to add it. I find it quite notable though for being unique from your average headshot. —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by 147.144.1.251 (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply
]

External Link

http://www.giantswd.org/ This link has very current news for giants, they are keeping uptodate patches on hand, and developing further. It seems more important to than most of the current links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.120.147 (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All external links have to comply with
WP:EL. The presented site is a fansite with guides, and tutorials on the games. As far as I can tell, it does not host software which would violate copyrights. It hosts/links to all the prominent mods for the game (though not notable by Wiki-policies, hence best left out of the article), graphical comparisons between the GeForce3/2 versions, and such. I would say it can contribute to the article with information which cannot be in the article due to policies, so it qualifies as a worthy external link. If no one objects, I second we put up Giants World Domination in the External links section. Jappalang (talk) 00:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Support. --Bryan H Bell (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Going to have to express some degree of confusion here - above user (Jappalang) states that GiantsWD would be a moderately valuable link to include - should nobody offer any objections - in the external links section, but then when a year has gone by with no such objection, removes the link once it has been added, and states that the link is not compliant with Wikipedia's external links policy? Now, I'll be the first to admit - quite readily, I might add - that I'm not all that particularly familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines and such... but that just seems a bit odd...

...at any rate, I have to echo my fellow unregistered user above - at this point in Citizen Kabuto's life, GWD is pretty much the only general purpose resource site for the game - and to the best of my knowledge doesn't host anything that is particularly unsavory or otherwise questionable... but again, I will admit to being a Wikinoob. :P 76.105.246.89 (talk) 06:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, your opinion matters, and I supported it too; however, Falcon9x5 deleted it. I will call him to offer his reasons for doing so. Jappalang (talk) 07:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Falcon9x5 concurs that we can add it back.[1] Jappalang (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I've changed the description in the external links and added an information about the patch released by the giantswd team. i believe it's important to say at the community that giants still alive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GREZZO16 (talk • contribs) 09:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a news site or a proponent for the game. It is meant to provide an objective article about the subject. Please see
WP:EL for why and in what manner certain sites are added to external links. Jappalang (talk) 06:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

2008 Rewrite

Hi, I will be rewriting this entire article soon. I will be making major changes to befit Wikipedia and Wikiproject Video Games (

WP:VG/GL
) standards. The structure will be:

  • Lead
  • Gameplay
  • Plot and settings
    • Characters
    • Story
  • Development
  • Reception
  • References
  • External links

Besides accordance with standard Wiki guidelines, the revised article will:

  • be neutral in point of view
    WP:NPOV
  • have verifiable sources
    WP:VG/S
  • have contents that are mostly notable
    WP:NOTABLE
  • not be a game guide as per
    WP:NOT#GUIDE
  • not be an article entirely based on in-universe information without real world relevances
    WP:GAMECRUFT
  • not be just lists of features and links
    WP:NOT#DIRECTORY
  • not a compilation of indiscriminate information
    WP:NOT#IINFO
  • not have materials which are of original research
    WP:OR

The aim is to achieve at least a B-grade article dealing with Giants: Citizen Kabuto the computer game, and not an in-depth in-universe look at the game's contents. Jappalang (talk) 14:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Rewrite is done. Comments and critiques to improve the article abiding the guidelines are welcome. Jappalang (talk) 07:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nice job, Jappalang! You added quite a bit of new material without discarding valuable earlier material. This article should be much more useful to Wikipedia's users now. -- Bryan H Bell (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I have requested
Wikiproject: Video games to assess the article. Hoping to get further comments and critiques from them too. Jappalang (talk) 08:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:VG
Assessment

Two (!) editors proposed A-class, and I think this article certainly is, barring a single thing I find lacking in comprehensiveness. This is the confusion between races and characters, specifically, two of the three title characters are discussed as "race", while the third is only referred to as "character". Perhaps the structure of this section can be cleared up a bit? User:Krator (t c) 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the statement on him being the only one of his race left in the Characters section, and changed the lead to refer to characters instead of race. Does this give a clearer picture? Are there any other places which might confuse readers? Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This information was quite essential to understand the rest of the article. After a second read, I think the Gameplay section could use some expansion. Currently, it is rather minimal and does not contain much information beyond the terms themselves. For example, the description of the real-time strategy elements in the game is pretty much a standard RTS. What was new and had influence on the genre in this game? Furthermore, the shooter part of the game (as written in the lead!) is not expanded upon at all. User:Krator (t c) 22:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the Gameplay section. I hope it can help you envision the game clearer. There are difficulties here as Giants is more appreciated for its humor and being a "first" in TPS-RTS than for intricate gameplay. Hence reviews and previews tend to skip any details on its shooter aspects. Are there any suggestions to help on this aspect? Jappalang (talk) 15:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had two points which I wanted to bring up (sorry, keep getting distracted), the expansion of gameplay has already dealt with one. The other was the article lead, it's very slim considering the wealth of good information accrued in the article. Some expansion there would seal the deal as far as I'm concerned. It's an excellent article, great work. Someoneanother 00:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lead has been expanded. Hopefully it contains the main flavor of the article. Are there anything else which needs improvement? Jappalang (talk) 03:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I'm concerned it's down to the good article reviewer now, and for Krator to give feedback in relation to the A rating. Thanks for your work. Someoneanother 05:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreeing with A-class, that's three editors so I'm going to go ahead and award it. --PresN (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think congratulations are in order for Jappalang whose effort on this article is almost singlehandedly responsible for the A-class designation. Nice work, Jappalang! --Bryan H Bell (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA

I've passed as GA. The only minor issue if you were to go to FAC with this would be some minor grammar issues; I suggest running it through a good copyedit. David Fuchs (talk) 03:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Development

May be worth to mention more explicitly:

(For reasons already mentioned in the article) Planet Moon was in extreme hurry when releasing Giants, it was "basically ripped out of their hands by Interplay" (from private conversation).

Some evidence:

  • They accidentally left both multiplayer cheats (via the in-game editor) and a command line argument to disable the CD check in the initial release version (http://www.gamefaqs.com/computer/doswin/code/197449.html)
  • At about half of the game in-game videos become less frequent and are completely absent in the last third (except Kabuto fight at the very end). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.36.200.216 (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, all these are just
reliable sources. If you can find such information sites that are reliable (generally established sites with rigorous editorial processes and not personal blogs or casual sites), we can take a look at the information and determine if it can be worked into the article. Jappalang (talk) 00:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Preemptive strike

What? a video game article on the main page? How much did Wikipedia get paid for this advertising???!! ... (more frothing at the mouth goes here) ... I have lost all respect for Wikipedia!!!!! JACOPLANE • 2009-03-5 09:58

No, Wikipedia does not accept bribes. Simply put, if the article is of great quality, it can become a featured article. --
talk) 14:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
It's a jolly article for a jolly-sounding game. Having said that, after a quick browse and a few edits, I feel it needs another copy-edit (I may be being unfair and there might just have been some dodgy edits since this article was on the front page). GDallimore (Talk) 15:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure Jacoplane is being sarcastic Nil Einne (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to change 'hereafter called Giants' to 'henceforth Giants'

Apparently this made it 'harder to read' when I changed it, so I would like to state the definition of henceforth.

henceforth or henceforward Adverb from now on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.170.249 (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is game is for sale at the following location for 5.99 it seems worth mentioning. Also note that it is DRM free and can be used and purchased from any location for the same price.

http://www.gog.com/en/gamecard/giants_citizen_kabuto —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.149.1.36 (talk) 14:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1.5 Patch

Something I think is noteworthy for the article: http://giantswd.org/?file=60
Considering the fact that the 1.5 beta versions have become the de facto standard for online play, as well as the fact that they correct most of the issues that people have had with the game since its release, it might be worth a mention... I wouldn't suggest anything to the extent that the unofficial patches have at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire:_The_Masquerade_%E2%80%93_Bloodlines, but some small blurb would likely be useful for owners of the game - old and new, though gog.com - passing through for some information. Any thoughts? I'd go ahead and add it in myself, however my Wikipedia-fu is a bit rusty... though if nobody else is particularly interested or inspired I'll give it a shot. 76.105.246.89 (talk) 02:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not if there are no reliable third-party coverage, per
WP:V. While I support giantswd as an external link, I do not view it as a suitable resource to cite information to. Jappalang (talk) 03:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
WP:RS states the following: "Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand." Given that GiantsWD is the ONLY site maintaining updates, modifications, and news with regards to the original game and has been since 2002, this site is an authoritative source in relation to the subject at hand. Wikipedia provides objective, reference material and I see no reason why the newest update/patch (1.497) should not be included. It is a significant milestone with regards to the game's development and within the gaming community, given that all public servers now run on this patch. It fixes many of the problems of the previous, official patch while introducing new features. There needs to be a sub-section within the "Development" section that address this new patch. 69.232.66.109 (talk) 21:47, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Articles should rely on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." That is why fansites are generally not considered. When established sources pick up mention of a new patch, then it can be mentioned with backing from a reliable source. A single fan-site does not become authorative or trustworthy just because it keeps faith with an out-of-production game. The concept of Wikipedia is to present an article to the general public about the game; not to make it a page for fans (per
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines). If a fan-made patch is reported by reliable third-party sources, then we would talk about it. Otherwise, it is not notable to be of mention. Jappalang (talk) 01:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Encyclopaedic tone

I changed the information based on GameZone's Andrew Goen's article from:

Andrew Groen of GameZone ran a retrospective on Giants and determined, "In a vacuum, this is a fantastic game that should be experienced by all. However, if you've been gaming in the last five years you've likely experienced so much of its latent influence that you've essentially played it all before."

to:

In 2009, Andrew Groen of GameZone ran a retrospective on Giants and suggested that the game's mix of humor and action inspired later games such as Ratchet & Clank and Jak and Daxter. He further commented that games of 2004–09 were influenced by Giants in one way or another.

The first I found was unencyclopaedic in tone. First, no one would know which "last five years" Groen is talking about. Second, in what "vacuum"?

Groen's article focused on Giant's legacy on other games, suggesting that it influenced later games. The change I made explains this and casts the information into an encyclopaedic light. This is a Featured Article and its contents should be maintained to the

required criterion, which includes prose and an encyclopaedic tone. Jappalang (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Toplessness

The article states that the game has generally been censored, however, a friend of mine believes that the european version remained untouched and there Delphi remained topless. Can anyone confirm this? I only have the American release. --94.223.80.53 (talk) 14:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 14:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 00:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Giants: Citizen Kabuto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Giants: Citizen Kabuto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giants: Citizen Kabuto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Giants:_Citizen_Kabuto&oldid=1201249312"