Talk:Good News from the Next World
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Fair use rationale for Image:Simple minds-goodnews.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Q
This album also got 4 stars by Q, one of the few positive UK reviews. A reference is http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html Laydsb (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- They were the antipode of hip at the time, and Real Life having been so aimless and bland probably blinded many reviewers to the qualities of their next album. It's their best and most cohesive '90s album and also (interestingly) no other album in their entire catalogue brings out the Catholic/Christian side of their background and inspiration more clearly than this one: it comes through convincingly and engagingly in many places. Of course that wasn't something that was gonna endear it to critics either! ;) 83.254.154.164 (talk) 11:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Good News from the Next World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030052714/http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html to http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030052714/http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html to http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030052714/http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html to http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030052714/http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html to http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030052714/http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html to http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030052714/http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html to http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)