Talk:Gymnosporangium

It's a shame that in the dispute over common names, they were dropped from this article entirely. BTW I would note that "cedar-apple rust" gets approximately 47,000 hits on Google, whereas "juniper-apple rust" gets only about 20 (in fact I had never encountered the latter name before seeing it here at Wikipedia). I think it's safe to say which is the more "common" name... MrDarwin 03:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes, this is a fairly commonly seen critter upstate ny, usa and it would be nice if it were more accessible. i'm putting a link to it from the gall wiki Wikiskimmer 17:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

links to species

i tried to link to link one of the spp in the TABLE to its stub, but i can't put the brackets in the table. there are stubs for half a dozen spp but this article doesnt hot link to 'em.

Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae Gymnosporangium yamadae Gymnosporangium clavipes Gymnosporangium nelsonii Gymnosporangium kernianum Gymnosporangium libocedri Gymnosporangium globosum Gymnosporangium sabinae

i hate formatting, anyone want to mess with it? maybe i'll put them in the taxobox? Wikiskimmer 17:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gymnosporangium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060825060707/http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/genus.cfm?id=Gymnosporangium to http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/genus.cfm?id=Gymnosporangium

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]