Talk:Gynecologic ultrasonography

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Reproductive Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance). Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Gynecologic ultrasonography. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

There are at least two spelling errors on this page. That does not add to credibility and is just plain sloppy. Where is tilde? 71.70.158.91 03:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So fix them?

Naconkantari 03:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

done! 71.70.158.91 13:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not being a medical professional, but being very much interested in politics, I came to this page to review the piece of legislature recently introduced in Virginia, forcing women wo want an abortion to take a transvaginal ultrasound. Unfortunately, I don't feel able to judge the necessity of this procedure from the article. As far as I know, this is discussed controversially ATM, so to allow the general public to pass knowledgeful judgement on this bill, someone with medical knowledge probably ought to complete the article with a non-biased section concerning that matter. --Intelensprotient (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There definitely needs to be more info on this page. I also came here in response to the current controversy.Lionfish0 (talk) 10:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]