Talk:Haryana Forestry case

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 16 March 2018 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs). project's importance scale .

	India Low‑importance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Law Low‑importance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a currently under investigation by

of those articles while losing the key details. Besides there are several entities, both investigating agencies and people being investigated, it is not commonsensical to merge with one entity. As the case progresses, it might go to Supreme Court and may spawn off multiple cases and counter-cases, chargesheets, additional investigations by the current or more agencies, and so on.

Politically motivated supporters might try to have it deleted due to

, might try to vandalise this article either by diluting or embellishing the facts.

Future editors: To keep the articles in adherence with

, please add only the court related details such as court verdicts, submissions in the court. Refrain from adding content that is usually outside the court or investigating agencies, such as the opinion/noise of supporters and opponents, even if those are reported in the reputed newspapers.

Keep this as a separate article and please add it to your watch list to protect it from the biased editing and vandalism.

Thanks. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]