Talk:Helsinki Accords

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles

Finland High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am surprised that there is no Finnish-language version of this article. – Kaihsu 14:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness, Finnish is a really hard language. --

talk) 19:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Finlandia-talo ulkisivu itapuolelta east side facade Photo Rauno Traskelin.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Self-explanatory - a single American uni-released statement/paper that starts with ; "The Soviet Union began to jam Western radio broadcasts to the Soviet Union in 1948.1 Jamming 2 has continued to be a problem since then," ...is self-exhibitive of bias.

how about some quotes from the discussions themselves, the meeting notes / both side's statements on the same issues, etc. 120.21.158.0 (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering especially in hindsight (at least), of the clear bias historically, and therefore dis-ingenuous nature of the PRIVATE/not-fully-disclosing nature of the fund and org. , it should be described as ; CLAIMED-independent, or puported-as, or something similar.

not simply, 'independent" - that infers direct-adjective attribution/nature. 120.21.158.0 (talk) 10:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]