Talk:Heresiology

	This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Christianity Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OK, right now this is basically a dicdef, but I think some substantial content from Heresy could be moved here. I'll leave this to the theologically learned, though. Sandstein 06:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps some of the content could be used, but heresiology, as a product of orthodoxy, would be implicit in such an article rather than an explicit focus. I'm writing a thesis which has heresiology as a large component and I'd be happy to fill this out a little, but it might take me a little while.24.117.147.97 15:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@Sandstein: I understand that, but if we are going to use a rare word (one that doesn't appear in most dictionaries) within the article, and said word is going to redirect to the article, shouldn't we define it in the article? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't see the -graphy variant redirected here. I'll restore the mention.  Sandstein  13:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]