Talk:History of the Chicago Bears

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconNational Football League Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Standard Score Notation

Scores are noted either one of 3 ways:

  • 21-17
  • (21-17)
  • 21 to 17

Which is preferred? KyuuA4 09:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm recommending the 3rd option: 21 to 17. This will differentiate from win-loss records, denoted like the 1st option. KyuuA4 09:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, use the third option for the scores, and the win-loss records would be denotated as (10–5–1) or (15–1).

Wordyness and Too Much Detail

Reading through some of the material here can be a headache - as trivia tends to dominate the text. KyuuA4 19:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Omit Needless Words" - 'nuff said I will go through the article sometime later, and try to consolidate it. Perhaps even add some references too. ;-) --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  03:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It'll be best to minimize the number of games mentioned where scores are included. Games such as playoff games, Super Bowls, and maybe critical season games should be fine. Critical season games should be those that made an impact on the season as a whole. KyuuA4 07:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding

I think we need to expand more information the Bears decade history. Alakazam has done a wonderful job with the 2000's so far. A goal is to write this history section better. The 1920s-1990's are too shallow. Does anyone agree? --Happyman22 02:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Personally, I am not in favor of the arbitrary division by decade. For example, Ditka's reign from 1982 to 1992 should be all in one section because he took the team to the playoffs in 7 of his 11 seasons as head coach, and made a significant impact on the popular culture of the team. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 18:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Exactly, redivide the Bears history into eras.
    • Indeed, Era's make more clear and distinct divisions than decades. KyuuA4 19:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The 20s are so incomplete there is so much more history of pre Bears-Staley 's era that need to be included. What was the Staley's nick name.it was Trafton's 11 after George [The Brute] Trafton Captained the Team to winning season's before the Bears were named Without it, The roots are missing, the Soldier field Storys of being Frozen & Torn etc
, what they did for fun turned in to American's favorite Sport s 47.157.177.45 (talk) 17:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I commented on the ratings comment page for this article, also the

Quadzilla99 01:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:1946Bears.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 04:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Chicagoland Sports Hall of Fame

I've started an article on Chicagoland Sports Hall of Fame and it needs a lot of work tracking down football players and filling in the details (Sport, Position, Local team, Other major team). Any help would be appreciated. Smallbones (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


1919 independent season

I understand the Staleys played football in 1919 should that also be included? ie Cardinals and Packers Smith03 (talk) 18:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Footnotes/References; Expansion

We might need more references/footnotes. Expansion might also be needed, as the Jauron and Wannstedt eras are awfully short and somewhat bland, in my opinion. We're going to need a lot more info to expand, then.

talk) 01:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Zappa[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 06:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:History of the Chicago Bears/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
Quadzilla99 01:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Last edited at 01:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of the Chicago Bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Chicago Bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_the_Chicago_Bears&oldid=1207209322"