Talk:Hollingbury
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
inactive . |
Assessment request
In response to the assessment request by Hzv5wk: Although Hollingbury is not included within the Sussex project (Brighton has its own project), I will have a look at your article. I have already upgraded it to a Start, and I will be back when I get a chance to study the article in detail.
If you have not yet read
In the meantime, I have generated an automated peer review. This gives some guidance towards possible
- Thanks. I've made some changes in line with the automated review. I'm not sure whether Hollingbury qualifies as a settlement but I will take a look at the guidelines you suggested. Hzv5wk (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Automated peer review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at [?]Done
- Consider adding more [?]Done
- You may wish to consider adding an appropriate [?](Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as [?]Done
- Watch for redundancy exercises.) Done
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.”
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
- As done in [?]Done
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, MortimerCat (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Changes made Hzv5wk (talk) 15:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Impressive - I just run the automated peer review again and it now only mentions the infobox MortimerCat (talk) 15:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Hollingbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511153803/http://matt.pope.users.btopenworld.com/hollin/Hollinhome.htm to http://matt.pope.users.btopenworld.com/hollin/Hollinhome.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223222336/http://www.hollingburyparkgolf.org.uk/index.cfm?request=b1141282 to http://www.hollingburyparkgolf.org.uk/index.cfm?request=b1141282
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721204958/http://www.hollingbury.info/about/about.php?about=OBCCC to http://www.hollingbury.info/about/about.php?about=OBCCC
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721205223/http://www.hollingbury.info/about/about.php?about=MedicalCentre to http://www.hollingbury.info/about/about.php?about=MedicalCentre
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721205245/http://www.hollingbury.info/newsletters/0811-HollingburyHello.pdf to http://www.hollingbury.info/newsletters/0811-HollingburyHello.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721205319/http://www.hollingbury.info/about/about.php?about=CardenPrimary to http://www.hollingbury.info/about/about.php?about=CardenPrimary
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090519102219/http://www.carden1983.com/ to http://www.carden1983.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090427213815/http://www.hollingbury.info/ to http://www.hollingbury.info/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)