Talk:IPL (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

requested move

. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move page. There doesn't seem to be a clear primary topic that a consensus agrees upon, so we'll leave things as they are for now. - GTBacchus^(talk) 23:19, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. Clear
  primary topic, as demonstrated by the nom. Jenks24 (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support, primary topic.--Kotniski (talk) 08:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose as it is not likely that there is a clear primary topic. For me, the primary use is
  Intellectual Property. If you look at the hits, this use on its own has more then 50% of the hits that the cricket league does 125,529 v 229,122. Combine that with the others in the list and there is no primary topic. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Eeh, but far more of the people looking for Indian Premier League are going to be searching for it as "IPL" than in the case of those looking for intellectual property.--Kotniski (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well maybe I hang around lawyers and computers too much, but IPL has two primary meanings for me and neither has to do with cricket. To move a dab page requires clear and overwhelming evidence. I'm clearly not convinced that exists here. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's the other one other than Intellectual property law? We could go for a dual primary topic at the top of the list, that has been done before and makes it clearer. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. No primary meaning. Intellectual Property Law and Initial Program Load are both contenders in my universe too. Andrewa (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KiloT 21:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose No primary meaning. --rogerd (talk) 02:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

requested move

. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. I'm not aware of "IPL" as a common acronym for intellectual property law. Make primary redirect to Indian Premier League. 162 etc. (talk) 17:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Even a quick look at the DAB indicates that a PT is most unlikely. See
  the problem with page views. Andrewa (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – if I'm reading the Wikinav data correctly, roughly 92% of the disambiguation page's viewers click on Indian Premier League, which is a pretty strong indication that it's "highly likely...to be the topic sought when a reader searches for" IPL. It's also worth noting that unlike some of the other entries on the dab page (e.g. intellectual property law), the cricket league is very frequently referred to as IPL; it's thus fairly analogous to
  NBA, for instance, both of which are primary redirects over lengthy dab pages. Moreover, the cricket league has a fair amount of long-term significance (it's "one of the biggest sporting leagues and the biggest cricketing league in the world"), while the other entries on the dab page generally don't. I support making IPL a primary redirect to Indian Premier League. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]