Talk:Indirasagar Dam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconIndia: Madhya Pradesh / Geography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconEnergy Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tense

As of 2015, this article describes the Dam in the future tense, but it is built already. Someone needs to update the article to describe the construction of the Dam in past tense, based on current information, not on what was projected. - Ben (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Indirasagar Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]