Talk:Io9

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speedy deletion proposal

In a curious turn of events,

general notability guideline. It is more than a little absurd to delete an article on a verifiably notable topic on grounds of notability, but if User:Thingg finds the facts of the matter cryptic, we can add the line "The blog has been covered by Wired and The New York Times" to save readers the effort of glancing a few centimeters downward. Yours, ɥʞoɹoɯoʞS 23:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

ca.io9.com

Perhaps it's a server error, perhaps it's the launch of a Canadian version, but that's the address io9.com redirects me to right now (July 28 2008 3:36PM Eastern). Incorrent redirection error is all it finds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.46.152.30 (talk) 19:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does the name "io9" mean? where does it come from? LordAmeth (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me?

I don't know if this site used to be something else, but as it stands today: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AuSCk2FY8YwJ:io9.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=u It's just a tumbler with ripped off content and movie PR pieces.

Who writes this crap. 108.23.206.179 (talk) 02:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Io9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205165702/http://timesonline.typepad.com/science/2010/02/best-science-blogs.html to http://timesonline.typepad.com/science/2010/02/best-science-blogs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]