Talk:Islamic adoptional jurisprudence
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Islamic adoptional jurisprudence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
inactive . |
Islam Low‑importance | |||||||
|
Kafala does not mean adoption in arabic. This article also leaves out the obvious reference to adoption in the Qur'an, Surat 33:4-5. It is also useful to point out that Tunisia is the only Muslim state to allow adoption as defined in Roman law. I will make said changes to this website if there are no comments. Zoticogrillo 20:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Zero-content site
I have removed once again the link to the external site. Until it says something, I see no reason it should be here. Tizio 14:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Please edit
There are spelling / grammatical errors in the latest page, but I can't find a way to edit the page. Someone with access, please edit. Thanks.
Merge
There is no need for a separate article.--عبد المؤمن (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
I believe that
- Adding the context that you just described to both articles would make sense - I've done what I could to add this context. But the main content of the two articles is different: "fixed term sponsorship contracts and associated human rights abuses" is a different topic to Islamic jurisprudence for adopting children. The terminology (in English) also seems to be different: "kafala" vs "kafala system", although HRW is careful to keep kafala in italics. I'm removing the merge tags, since the two articles are on different content, the tags are old, and adding context and appropriate disambiguation notes at the top of the pages is a more appropriate way of reducing the chance that people arrive with a search engine at a different article to the one they expect. (There was also a technical problem with the merge tag at kafala system, since it pointed to the kafala system talk page instead of this one.) Boud (talk) 21:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please feel welcome to add sourced content in the section Kafala_system#Legal_context_and_etymology - this would help show the readers of that article that the migrant-worker-control system is legally/historically/etymologically a system of treating migrant workers as legal minors (similarly to the Saudi male guardianship system that Saudi women are campaigning against, because it treats them as minors too). Boud (talk) 21:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Islamic adoptional jurisprudence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060212143553/http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/059.sbt.html to http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/059.sbt.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130719080214/http://www.kafala.fr/petition to http://www.kafala.fr/petition
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)