Talk:Isomorphic keyboard

Should this be merged with generalized keyboard? It's not clear what the distinction is. — Gwalla | Talk 23:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the sections listing external links to modern implementations of isomorphic keyboard layouts. I don't think it's advertising, compared to what can normally be seen on most Wikipedia pages related to computer hardware and technology. 151.30.36.217 (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See

"other stuff exists" is not a valid argument on Wikipedia, mostly because we aren't a finished encyclopedia and many of our articles are in need of cleanup similiar to the type that I do. Them From Space 20:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Add link to Android app "IsoKeys"

I am the author of a new isomorphic-keyboard app for the Android platform. It is called "IsoKeys" and lives at http://isokeys.sourceforge.net. I would like to include a link to this URL in the *Software* section, so that Android users know there is a way for them to experiment with isomorphic keyboards. This seems reasonable to me, since there is already a link to Musix, the iPhone app. But to avoid any conflict of interest, I think another editor should add this, not me.

IsoKeys is available for free and is open-source.

Cheers, Rndlph (talk) 18:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Isomorphic keyboard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fig. 1 - wrong octave in first column

Shouldn't the first column's octave be shifted up by 1?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.129.85.112 (talk) 16:23, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should. This is a common mistake: see Scientific pitch notation#Nomenclature. Double sharp (talk) 08:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]