Talk:Italian invasion of Albania

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Balkan / European / Italian / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) European military history task force Italian military history task force (c. 500–present) World War II task force welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Italian invasion of Albania appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and was completed within five days? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With some c-e's, Aigest, Constantine and I we can bring this article easily to GA class. --Sulmues ^(talk) 13:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC) I'll do my best Aigest (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added WP Italy wikiproject since the article also includes Italy invading Albania. Have also left it unrated for someone in WP Italy wikiproject to rate it. Adamdaley (talk) 22:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it was unreferenced and I do not believe there ever was an official "Italian Empire". 216.8.148.227 (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

in the first instance unreferenced material just needs to be tagged, using Template:Citation needed or a similar tag. That allows other editors to identify a need to provide a source rather than removing it completely. I suggest you tag it. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 21:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it would be very helpful if someone could get a definitive source on albanian and italian casualties in the entire invasion. the infobox numbers have been changed several times and it'd be good to pin down the statistics and have it sourced within the infobox. Capt Jim (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While it there are clear that Albanian was invaded and King Zog forced into exile, the concept of Personal Union it is not in accordance to the definition. Thus I suggest it should be edited.QTeuta (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)QTeuta[reply]

It is clear in a number of sources, and Lemkin even provides translated copies of the legislation. Do you have a reliable source that says it wasn't a personal union, or are you relying on the WP article? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 20:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In all honesty, I saw the definition of Personal Union and saw that was not fit for the situation of occupied Albania. As I researched this term was used from the Italians to legitimate their presence in Albania. Therefor it may have been duplicated. As it is clearly stated in a letter to the New York Times, from an Albanian delegation in the case of Albania; Incorporate Union was an appropriate term to use as the Italian invasion was an outright annexation. Thank you for following up.QTeuta (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)QTeuta[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Italian invasion of Albania's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Ro106":

• From
  ISBN 0-521-84515-7
  .
• From
  ISBN 0-521-84515-7
  .

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italian invasion of Albania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101008171933/http://kohajone.com/html/artikull_40441.html to http://www.kohajone.com/html/artikull_40441.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think that we should compare and contrast all different estimates and their sources. Fischer discusses casualties according to Italians, Albanians and modern estimates: Reports on the number of casualties differed rather significantly. The townspeople of Durrës maintained that the Italians lost four hundred. Although Italian propaganda claimed that Italy lost only twelve men in the entire invasion, it is possible that approximately two hundred Italians were killed at Durrës alone and that they may have lost as many as seven hundred in all.--Maleschreiber (talk) 22:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]