Talk:Jallianwala Bagh

	This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think this page should just redirect to the

jallianwala bad≤  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.237.193 (talk) 12:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jallianwala Bagh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070917142903/http://www.commonlii.org/in/legis/num_act/jbnma1951276/ to http://www.commonlii.org/in/legis/num_act/jbnma1951276/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For Later years section: Does it qualify as

I think the visits and apology etc things are covered well in Jallianwala Bagh massacre#Monument and legacy. So here it should only focus on the "place" with brief history. What do you think? -Nizil (talk) 06:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nizil Shah:...Sure. We could see if other well documented and widely publicized visits have happened or leave it out. I'll have a read around. Thank you for watching over. What do you suggest? Maybe other editors might help. Whispyhistory (talk) 10:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

Amitabh Bachan...[1], [2], but I can't tell if when it started and if if temporally stopped or is still playing. Whispyhistory (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

@Whispyhistory: The light and sound show seem stopped due to lack of funds according to reference. So I suggest not to include it in the article (Reference of Feb 2019). The visits were well publicised and are covered in massacre article. I suggest to focus on place and memorials here. History of the massacre and visits are better left to massacre article because of better context there. Regards,Nizil (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure...will expand on memorials over time...I hope I have done ok...Whispyhistory (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Whispyhistory: After recent edits, I have cleaned up and reorganised the article. Please have a look. The early history (before massacre) needs references (tagged citation needed). I think some images in Jallianwala Bagh#Site next to text in each section (Entrance etc.) would give better context instead of images presented in Gallery. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 07:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nizil Shah:... Looks good. I will do as you have suggested... sounds sensible. Whispyhistory (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Historical-lane.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

soma loud 106.206.45.185 (talk) 13:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jallianwala bagh 205.253.11.197 (talk) 10:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]