Talk:Japan–Korea Agreement of August 1905

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Japan: History Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the History task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: Kako River (Japan) A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Korea Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups. defunct .East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Is "agreement" the best or most appropriate word for this article name? The first paragraph of Treaty establishes a context for this thread:

"A treaty is an

international organizations

. A treaty may also be known as: (international) agreement, protocol, covenant, convention, exchange of letters, etc. Regardless of the terminology, all of these international agreements under international law are equally treaties and the rules are the same."

There are very clear pro- and con- arguments:

• Yes, in terms of WP:MOS#Article title and
  reliable sources
  employ the term "agreement."
• No, in terms of the 1965
  Japan-Korea Protocol of August 1904#Recision and Lee Man-yeol. "For a view of history that puts us at the center,"
  Northeast Asian History Foundation News. 2010.

I have just modified one external link on Japan–Korea Agreement of August 1905. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005153650/http://english.historyfoundation.or.kr/data/Newsletterlist/1008_eng/sub02.html to http://english.historyfoundation.or.kr/data/Newsletterlist/1008_eng/sub02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]