This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
Improve grammar
Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
Discuss desired additions -None
Class size
The lead line says this was the lead ship of a 2-ship class, but there were four ships in the class. Was it originally intended to be just two, and then supplemented? Or is the "2-ship" reference just a mistake? Rem01 09:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I looked this up myself - the third and fourth ships listed as part of the class are in fact part of the
Aoba class, which is nearly identical to the Furutaka. I'm changing the listing of ships accordingly. Rem01 11:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
Absolutely OPPOSE. The existing title is in conformance with WP:Ships and WP:MIL-Hist format, and is the the same format for every other Imperial Japanese Navy cruiser article in Wikipedia. I find nothing awkward about the title of this article and no justification for change.--MChew (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. This is the agreed-upon format for Japanese warship article titles. Cla68 (talk) 05:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]