Talk:Jonathan Troy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Deleted the following line on the basis of

WP:NOR
:

Most of Abbey's characters are deeply flawed in some way, and yet there is usually something noble about them. You may disagree with the means of the
Monkey Wrench Gang
, but you understand the cause they're fighting for.

It seems to me to be a novel interpretation of Abbey's work, it's too general, and it's not even about the book at hand. Lowerarchy 18:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The entire plot summary here is written like a student's book report, blending fact, opinion, and unsourced context. It repeatedly uses the second person voice, which is certainly not encyclopedic. Unfortunately, this is Abbey's least available work, and I don't know of an easy way to correct it. Simply deleting the summary looks like a clear downgrade; can anyone source a better summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.218.242 (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]