Talk:Josephology

A fact from Josephology appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that theological disciplines? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/June.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Theology / Saints Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as High-importance). Catholicism High‑importance Josephology is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

I don't see anything in

The key word in WP:SEEALSO is "generally". Just because it is mentioned is no reason for non-inclusion. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:00, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, see also

WP:IAR and the Five Pillars. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Overlinkage used to be a "real" perceived problem. I'm of mixed opinion. I love links especially when I come across a term I'm not familiar with it. Sometimes by the end of the article I wish dupe links exist which is why having Mariology in the See also makes sense. Only major topics should be See alsos but that's my two cents. ----moreno oso (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As for overkill, the only overkill I see is in this discussion. Josephology is like Mariology, so what is the big deal with Mariology in the See also? It is there as a ref-point. It does not bite. I promise. History2007 (talk) 18:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]