Talk:Joyas Prestadas

Joyas Prestadas has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 8, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin music: Regional Mexican music Low‑importance

	Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Regional Mexican music task force.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Joyas Prestadas appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 January 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the songs Jenni Rivera chose to cover on her album Joyas Prestadas were songs she listened to while working as a cashier?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joyas Prestadas.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Joyas Prestadas/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:

talk · contribs) 23:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Erick! I'll have the pleasure of reviewing this article. Initial comments coming soon.--

talk) 23:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Review

A question - Is this a double-album or two independent releases that are merged into one article? Looking at the track listing they appear to have the same set.

The latter as shown on the charts. Perhaps I should make a clarification on that part though. Any suggestions?

Maybe you should make a distinction in the intro. Let's say "Joyas Prestadas consists of eleven cover versions, with the first album being recorded in Latin pop, while the second was recorded in banda". "Both albums were produced by Enrique Martinez".

unlink Mexican-American in the lead

Done

The second and third paragraph in the introduction read fine.
I suggest to include a non-free use rationale in the audio description of the song. Just to avoid any possible difficulties.

Though it's not really necessary since this has never been brought up before (not even in the FACs I've been to). What is usually looked is the description of the sample to ensure it has a rationale sample. Still can't hurt to include it I suppose.

I agree, but suggested it because I had a similar experience not so long ago.

It seemed like the description wasn't expanded at the revision. Well, I don't know, but either way the non-free usage is there. :)

The charts, certification tables, credits and references list look solidly written and well organised. More comments on the prose to follow.--

talk) 07:43, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

You can slightly re-arrange the second part of the sentence: "whom made them notable back in their original release" because it seems kind of confusing.
Is there a possibility to expand the "Background" section?

Otherwise than the above mentioned, the text as a whole is acceptable according to the GA criteria.--

talk) 00:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

For the first issue, I just decided to remove it. I think it's a given that the original singers made it famous. For the second issue, I just took at the booklet and didn't have any information that wasn't already included in the article. For some reason, background sections are my weakest part of writing album and song articles. Erick (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that won't affect my decision to pass it. Great work and congratulations.--

talk) 21:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for the review. I'm glad this was able to pass before the anniversary of the tragedy. Erick (talk) 23:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Joyas Prestadas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.monitorlatino.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/charts/internationalcharts/mexico
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.centrodedesarrollodigital.com/amprofon3/Top100.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120131103352/http://www.amprofon.com.mx/Archivos/PDF/top_anual/Top_100_Album_2011.pdf to http://www.amprofon.com.mx/Archivos/PDF/top_anual/Top_100_Album_2011.pdf
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DuDuXGkh?url=http://www.amprofon.com.mx/Archivos/PDF/top_anual/Top_100_Album_2012.pdf to http://www.amprofon.com.mx/Archivos/PDF/top_anual/Top_100_Album_2012.pdf
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6WJgyz8vc?url=http://www.centrodedesarrollodigital.com/amprofonanual/100.php to http://www.centrodedesarrollodigital.com/amprofonanual/100.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]