Talk:KVPT
A fact from KVPT appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:KVPT 18 PBS.JPG
Please go to
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:34kjoi.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:KVPT 18 2006.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on KVPT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 22:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- ... that Valley Public Television once raffled off a 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud, per the wishes of the man who bequeathed it to the station? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-fresno-bee-misgivings-about-big-kvpt/124729591/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-selma-enterprise-riding-in-style-se/124729631/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sheila P. Burke
- Comment: DYKcheck isn't flagging it, but at 16493 characters, it is a 5x from Special:Permalink/1151240113, the immediately preceding revision.
5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 08:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/KVPT; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Hi Sammi Brie (talk), review follows: I confirm more than 5x expansion from 15 May; article is cited inline throughout to reliable sources for the subject (largely local newspapers); I didn't pick up any overly close paraphrasing in a spotcheck on sources and Earwig check is fine (once the quotes are excluded); hook fact is mentioned in the article and checks out to sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Can't see any issues here - Dumelow (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)