Talk:Kammerlader

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kammerlader article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
July 3, 2009	Featured article review	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / Nordic

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Image:Kammerlader 1.jpg

The copyright issules around the picture Image:Kammerlader 1.jpg seem dubious to me. I reolise that WegianWarrior took the picture, but the Norwegian Defence Museum created the orriginal display so I would be suprised if they don't retain copyright on any pistures of their displays. I could be wrong. --JK the unwise 14:31, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed in the last peer review I put the atricle thru:

Those photos I've photographed is hanging in the Armed Forces Museum in oslo, Norway, and as such is a work of the Norwegian Goverment (represented by the armed forces in this cause). It's generaly held that such works are free to be used for educational purposes, as born out in the Norwegian copyright law, sections 13 (personal use) and section 18 (Collective Works for Use in Education, etc). I can certainly testify that the photos in question has been on display for a lot longer than the five years required in the law =).

So, AFAICT, a photography of the photographs is free of any copyright issues for educational purposes, and since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and an encyclopedia is educational, everything is a-ok. WegianWarrior 18:07, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool.--JK the unwise 20:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Civilian Models of Kammerlader

Is there any further info on the "varous models" of civilian Kammerladers? 84.0.15.140 08:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dead article

Could someone who can read Norwegian please investigate this dead reference:

An article in the Norwegian magazine Jeger, hund våpen, retrieved
15 September 2005

I think that all they did was switch to PHP technology, but since the TITLE of the article was not given, I have no way of finding it and updating the link. Also a PUBLICATION DATE, ISSUE NUMBER, AUTHOR would have helped, especially in these non-English references.--SallyForth123 17:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to go ahead an tag this with {{

Refimprove}}. If there is no progress in the next several months, then I think that a WP:FAR will be in order.--SallyForth123 18:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Shortage of references

This article has been tagged for lack of citations since August 2007. It is also unusually list-heavy for a featured article. Does anyone who knows the subject have an interest in addressing these shortcomings? Durova^Charge! 14:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge in
Landmark conversion

Landmark conversion is already covered in this article under "Modification to rimfire". The standalone article doesn't have any sources or significantly more information. The merge was proposed before but the editor forgot to post here so it never went through. Rezin (talk) 19:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Done Klbrain (talk) 17:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kammerlader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]