Talk:Keith (song)/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This shouldn't take too long --K. Peake 08:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

• Shouldn't you write self-published instead of independent in the infobox since the latter may lead to readers thinking it is the label name?
  • Since there is an article titled independent record label page I believe that independent is the right word to use. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Directly after writing/production, mention the recording in the same sentence

• "it was independently released on" → "It was independently released as a single on" starting a new sentence here
• "consider it a tribute song to him." → "to consider it as a tribute song to him."
• ""Keith" peaked at" → "The song peaked at"
  • "Song" is already mentioned twice in the previous sentence though. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*New Zealand Hot Singles chart →

• "Bell sang the track on" → "Bell sang it on"
• "Bell was lauded by" → "Bell was applauded by" per the body
• "She also performed "Keith" in" → "She also performed the song in"
  • The next sentence begins with "The song" and I believe that would also be repetitive. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Add a part about the synopsis
  • For the live video or for the music video? Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Background and release

*"when she brought the song to" → "when she brought the idea to"

• "songs take you back."" → "songs take you back"." per
  MOS:QUOTE
• Mention that the release was as a single

Composition

*""Keith" is a country song" → "Musically, "Keith" is a country song"

• "and that she had it on her phone for year before deciding to" → "and was on her phone for year before she decided to"
• Remove speech marks around pays tribute since that is not a direct quote from both sources
• "into our past."" → "into our past"." per MOS:QUOTE

Reception and promotion

• "Triple M stated that" → "The staff of Triple M stated that"
  • "The staff" is not mentioned in the composition section either though. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Why are you using re-entered despite no previous position having been mentioned?
  • In the source the ribbon on the bottom right of "Keith" says "RE-ENTRY". Should I still look for its original position? Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*"calling it "touchy"" → "calling it "touching"" per the source

• "catchy it was."" → "catchy it was"." per MOS:QUOTE
• "An official music video was" → "An official music video for the song was" with the wikilink
  • Used "the single" instead as song is mentioned in the previous sentence already. Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

• Good

Charts

• Good

Release history

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks strong at 15.3%!!!
• What exactly makes Who a reliable source on ref 13?
  • According to its article, it is the sister paper of
    WP:RSP. The only bit Who sources is the guitar one but I'm not opposed to removing it if you think it isn't reliable enough! Sebbirrrr (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]