Talk:Keres Defence

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chess Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

3. Nf3 and Bb2 (listed as responses in article) do not appear to be legal responses. Bd2, Nc3, and Nd2 seem possible. --Tabor 22:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Sjakkalle 08:56, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, but "Qd2" doesn't just "seem to be dubious", it's just plain bad, losing a queen for a bishop at no compensation. (unsigned)

It is so obvious to even a beginner that I think it could be taken out. Bubba73 (talk), 05:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I took out most of that line. Bubba73 (talk), 05:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]