Talk:Kiên Giang province

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Literal meaning

Article needs literal meaning of province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 07:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Nom Foundation and Chinese Wikipedia both give . Badagnani (talk) 04:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody please tell me why we need Chinese character for a modern Vietnamese province? In Vietnam, these characters are meaningless to the common people and are not officially used. How do you put Chinese characters for Kontum Province? Even the Vietnamese Wiki on this topic does not use Chinese characters.--Vuhoantran (talk) 09:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hán Tự

I couldn't believe the name Kiên Giang was rendered from Hán tự because this province was founded and named by South Vietnam government.--Amore Mio (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


That's a good question. Even if provinces are new, the names may be old (formerly the name of something other than a province), or else the names are of Sinitic origin and thus have a meaning and phonetics that derive from Chinese. The problem seems to be that there is no accessible source giving the etymologies of place names in Vietnam, as, for example, we have for the names of all 50 states in the United States. If you could find such a source it would be wonderful. Right now we're relying on the expert from the Nom Foundation in Vietnam who provided the list of Hán tự for the province names about two years ago. Badagnani (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't believe the name Kiên Giang was rendered from Hán tự because this province was founded and named by South Vietnam government. I ask for a RS for this Hán Tự (not from nomfoundation, a foundation which rendered almost all VN place name into Han tu without cite anything). Moreover, place name of southern Vietnam was usually mispronounced from a original Hán Tự name (for example, Mỹ Tho is a mispronunciation of "Mỹ Thu", Thoại Sơn (a mountain) is a mispronunciation of "Thụy Sơn"). So, the usage of Hán Tự in theses article should come with a great care.

To Mr. B. If you really want literal meaning, you could add a note next to the name (Kiên Giang (lit. .....)). Don't adding Hán Tự without a proper source.

I really want to help but I haven't got enough source and skill, and I don't want to be reckless. I'm sorry.

--Amore Mio (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Kiên Giang provinceKiên Giang Province – Revert capitalization to pre-Kauffner status and current consensus. NVanMinh (talk) 17:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on

Talk:An Giang Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

Kiên Giang Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]