Talk:Kincade Fire

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 24 October 2019 by reviewer SamHolt6 (talk · contribs). California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. project's importance scale .

Wildfire Low‑importance

Kincade Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm going to work on expanding this article later tonight. I also have some pictures. Thanks for starting it! Missvain (talk) 15:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm think of adding an impact section between now and the next two hours or so. Are you planning on doing something large soon and I'll honor the note on top of the section or do you want me to wait? Leaky.Solar (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need all those "zones" of evacuation? I think it would be equally informative to list just the whole evacuated area. As of 10/28 06:15, it has increased to 200,000 people evacuated. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/10/28/kincade-fire-evacuation-map-expands-sonoma-county/?outputType=amp —

Yes, the evacuation zone history is really important and useful. From a historical context (look at this article in 2025), seeing how the Zones were rolled out in stages is key. There will be lots of public policy discussion regarding fast enough? too fast? This kind of information really fits an "encyclopedia." I'd recommend adding back in that information.MikeVdP (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The containment % from 5% to 15% should be in the grey part of the bar chart, not in the red part indicating fir burning. Thanks. Reinhard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:AB10:5DB0:8521:2DD8:3C36:ACF7 (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]