Talk:King of Kings (1961 film)

Untitled

The POV should be fixed up. — Jacib 03:41, 5 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Salome dancing.jpg

The image

requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salome's dance

Did her dance involved veils ? Is it right to refer to is as a dance of the seven veils ? -- Beardo (talk) 10:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC) The film was recently broadcast. She does a dance but it doesn't involve "7" veils but only one.MARK VENTURE (talk) 04:38, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear

talk) 06:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

There is no such thing as Bly-ray DVD

Technirama process

Technirama and Super Technirama/Super Technirama 70 were filming technology that used 35mm negative film run horizontally in the camera with the standard pitch 8 perforations. The camera was fitted with special anamorphic lens with 1.5 squeeze factor, so when optically printed to 35mm film it allowed for standard Cinemascope-compatible prints with either 4-magnetic stereo tracks or with one standard optical track (either mono or Perspecta-encoded quasi-stereo). The process also allowed for optical printing to standard 70mm film with 6-track magnetic stereo. The 70mm prints were made for premiere releases and marketed as Super Technirama. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.64.97.254 (talk) 07:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could this article in the future ever address who and/or what inspired this film's unique theology?

After watching the film, I ventured the idea that King of kings was directly inspired by the discussions and debates of the time surrounding the newly discovered texts of the Nag Hammadi library, and how those texts informed historical viewpoints of first century Judea and Christian theology at large. In trying to confirm or deny this theory, I came to this Wikipidea article to try and learn something about the original intentions of the creators of King of Kings, and alas found nothing whatsoever.

Perhaps someone out there could write something for me and future readers of this page? I'd be greatly obliged, Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayner-hills (talk • contribs) 05:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]