Talk:Kireedam (2007 film)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles Film: Indian This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in March 2012.

The "Box Office" section in this version reads "Despite a soft launch, Kireedam audio sales overtook that of Sivaji in just three weeks.[2]". The reference provided reads "The music is a big hit, with most of the music shops reporting that the nephew (G.V Prakash) has beaten the uncle’s (A.R Rahman) Sivaji audio sale, last week!".

I take it to mean that in the last week more cassettes/CDs of Kireedam were sold than of Sivaji - not that Kireedam in three weeks sold more than Sivaji did in so many weeks. Tintin 13:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kireedam (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20080125131210/http%3A//chennaionline.com/film/Onlocation/2007/04kireedam.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324233636/http://www.businessofcinema.com/news.php?newsid=4445 to http://www.businessofcinema.com/news.php?newsid=4445

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]