Talk:Knuckleheads

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.

Requested move 14 October 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. (

talk) 02:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Knuckleheads → Knuckleheads (TV series) – Not the primary topic for Knuckleheads. 67.149.246.163 (talk) 01:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per
WP:OVERPRECISION. There's nothing else on WP called precisely "Knuckleheads". Just add a hatnote if anyone could be confused. Station1 (talk) 07:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Knuckleheads Saloon is called Knuckleheads on its official website: https://www.knuckleheadskc.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.246.163 (talk) 17:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then it definitely deserves a hatnote, but most sources do call it "Knuckleheads Saloon", so that's the best title for that article, which doesn't conflict with this one. Station1 (talk) 06:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Are we suggesting that Knuckleheads be a redirect to Knucklehead? The plural is only ambiguous with Knuckle Heads. I've added a hatnote to both articles but I don't think any further action is necessary. PC78 (talk) 08:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Only the Skinhead appears to be ambiguous with the "s" and the term "Knucklehead" (singular) isn't even mentioned there so I don't think this is necessary but if done then I expect we would redirect back to the Knucklehead DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Knuckleheads should be an R from Plural to Knucklehead._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:09, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support No primary topic here per [1], especially as ZXCVBNM has said, it should first and foremost be a plural redirect to the disambig page. So move per proposal and redirect
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose per Station1. In the plural form, this primarily refers to the TV series. The DICDEF isn't sufficiently important that we should redirect to it. — Amakuru (talk) 11:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support this move 2601:541:4500:1760:65C0:402F:C2B3:62B4 (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – it's the only topic in the plural form. A reader looking for information about another knucklehead will not type in the "s". Once the reader types in the "s", we can be reasonably certain they're looking for the movie (and not the saloon). – Levivich 15:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support when I Google Knuckleheads from England the Saloon article comes up as the 3rd result but the TV series doesn't. That taking into account the different spaced topic and Skinhead seems to suggest disambiguation might be best but I'm not sure. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.