Talk:Koragg the Knight Wolf

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tokusatsu This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tokusatsu, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tokusatsu on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TokusatsuWikipedia:WikiProject TokusatsuTemplate:WikiProject TokusatsuTokusatsu articles Fictional characters This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

What episode did Koragg name his weapons? 63.204.72.28 00:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the "Knight Sword" but he's definitely said "Wolf Shield" at least once. BTW, sign your comments next time. Ace Class Shadow 00:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The PRMF toy page at www.rangercentral.com called his sword the Knight Saber Max, before the image of the toy was replaced with a remake called Mystic Saber Max Coronis 00:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. Let's go with simply "Knight Saber". I find a serious use of "Max" to designate his sword highly unlikely. Ace Class Shadow 08:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that it has been revealed that Koragg is indeed Lienbow, do you think we should move the information about Lienbow in the "Allies in Power Rangers: Mystic Force" to here?Unknown Dragon 20:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that we should wait for the second part of the episode until we do anything drastic like that. If anything, this page should be about the villain, and information on Lienbow would be moved to the Ranger page. Ryūlóng 20:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Easy, Junior. Since he is one character, the majority of the information should be in one place, his article. A little side bit can be added to his original listing on the allies page. However, he is by no means a ranger and listing him there would be flatout inaccurate. Now, whilst the reveal was rushed and done in a way that would kids go "Wow!" and "huh?" It's still a clear reveal. The memories which had been plaguing him prove that. The next step is formatting the article to clearly state the timeline. We cn fill in the blanks of how Koragg came to be when they're similarly revealed. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 17:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Going off of the Magiranger timeline, as well as the rushed aspect of Mystic Force, I would think that PR will give Leanbow the ability to morph into the red-armored form (Wolzard Fire) fairly soon, and he would later be considered a Power Ranger. This can be the main page for Leanbow/Koragg, however entries specifically about either aspect of the character would remain in the Allies/Villains/Rangers pages. Ryūlóng 20:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Going off of Ryulong's above post, I'm pretty sure Leanbow will be given the ability to change into Red Koragg pretty quickly aswell. I also have a couple of theories/possibilites regarding Leanbow/Red Koragg.

1. Koragg may be reffered to as either the Wolf King or Mystic Wolf in his good state (Im leaning more towards Wolf King, personally)
2. Leanbow will be given a morphing sequence and a bit more prominence than Wolzard Fire. From what Ive read and heard, Wolzard Fire only prominently appeared in Magi atleast twice: In his debut episode (Which I saw) and again in the finale. I could be wrong there though. Chebo 11:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While a good portion of that may be true, I feel that this article should focus on the character Koragg/Leanbow as the villain, whereas Leanbow as a hero/ally/Other Ranger/Ranger-like Ally should remain in the other articles that mention Leanbow (

Mystic Force Power Rangers, although the entry at the former will more than likely merge into the latter), while using this article as a {{main}} page on the character's history. Ryūlóng 01:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Koragg, as he was originally known (evil and purple), is gone. A good and red-colored version of Koragg will show up, but that will be Leanbow's morphed form. Ryūlóng 00:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I am basically saying is that there is no more footage of Wolzard (Koragg) from Magiranger, and he will not reappear in Mystic Force as evil, but the character Leanbow will reappear in his Ancient Mystic Mode and as "Red Koragg". Ryūlóng 00:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might be possible (although not likely) that the evil and Koragg and Leanbow could have been seperated and that Leanbow may have to face his dark half, a similar plot device that has happened before, like in Wild Force when Merrick fought against Zen-Aku.Unknown Dragon 23:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But didn't that storyline exist already in

GaoRanger? Ryūlóng 00:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Indeed, the evil Koragg is gone, but up until "The Return" airs, Leanbow has appeared in the purple Koragg armour. As previously stated, a new red Koragg will appear which will be Leanbow's morphed form. I personally think it would be interesting to see Leanbow call himself Koragg again in this red form, especially since he discarded the name back in "Hard Heads"Chebo

Centralized discussion here. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

This page is primarily about Koragg as the villain, not Leanbow. I would prefer that information pertaining specifically to Leanbow be split up into the

Mystic Force Power Rangers article, with this page serving as a document of the history of Koragg.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Hmm. I've read up on some of your previous comments. Forgive me, but that's a bad idea, and I'd like you to let go of it already. This the main character article. Trying to separate information that way you recommend is confusing and pointless. The data ends up here anyway. I'm making the necessary alternations. Izhmal (User page | User talk page) 02:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you, and I would suggest that we discuss these changes now. There is not enough information here on Leanbow to dominate this article. This was about Koragg, and it will remain to be about Koragg.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was about Koragg because that's the form he originally appeared in. Now, Leanbow has become good and taken a new name. Koragg is in the past. This linked throughout a "main article" for the character overall, not just a source for further information about Koragg, the villain. Izhmal (User page | User talk page) 02:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will concede that this character's information should remain in a single article, however I do not believe that it is necessary to rename the page. He was Koragg much longer than Leanbow, and we can always redirect

Leanbow here.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

"Leanbow" is his true name. "Koragg" is now just something he was called. It does happen sometimes that character is retitled in Wikipedia for accuracy or disambiguation purposes. I'd say this is a case of the latter. It's just clearer that way. Izhmal (User page | User talk page) 02:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Koragg is what he's been known for the longest and the name by which he is easily recognized. - DrachenFyre > YOU! 02:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken, though I disagree. He hasn't been called "the Knight Wolf" very regularly and now it's highly unlikely he'll even be called "Koragg". While he may have debuted and become well known with that name, it is best now that we change it for accuracy. Also, let me give you an example...

I can call you "The One and Only" all I want. You coud call yourself by it and be known by it. You'd still be "DracheFyre", y'know?

Oh and please don't move my comments. Izhmal (User page | User talk page) 02:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, there was an editing conflict which is why the comments were moved. Don't get all defensive, jeeze. Secondly, Osiris the Sky Dragon and Sky Dragon of Osiris both point to Slifer the Sky Dragon, the most obvious and widely used name for the card, even though Osiris was used long before Slifer. The question is what name is more recognizable: Slifer or Osiris? Same question applies to Leanbow or Koragg. Or, more importantly than that, why can't we just leave the article the way it is since we address Koragg's real identity in the article to begin with? - DrachenFyre > YOU! 03:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Koragg should have a seperate page because as Mystic Fate showed that a new Koragg can be made very easily.

Alianbow is not the proper spelling, Leanbow is.RangerKing 15:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The character was known as Koragg for the longest time, and the two's histories are intertwined. Because Nick used the powers was generally unrelated to the character. It's sort of like with

Kamen Rider TheBee; there were at least three individuals who held the title and powers, yet we only have one article on TheBee.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

It is Leanbow, not Alianbow. Tyar 09:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]