Talk:Kranji MRT station
Kranji MRT station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 27, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 7 January 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kranji MRT Station to Kranji MRT station. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Fair use rationale for Image:NS logo.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120730183552/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/324989/1/.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/324989/1/.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426164707/http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_364_2005-01-28.html to http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_364_2005-01-28.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131231050129/http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_365_2005-01-28.html to http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_365_2005-01-28.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kranji MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 13:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit waror content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are suitable captions:
- A. Images are
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
- Similar issues like the previous article.
- Expand lead a little bit if possible.
- Ventilation spelling wrong.
- What is kampung?
- Need citation for the note.
- "www.lta.gov.sg" omit www
- Several citations don't have any link. As much as I know Straits Times articles are archived.
- Any artwork details?
- Need citation for the note.
- Add "NS7" as station code in infobox.
- Omit things like "| Press Room | Land Transport Authority" from citations.
- Use Template:SGDConvert wherever applicable.
- SMRT Trains not mentioned in body. Also its unsourced.
- If possible add more wikilinks.
- A direct source for this is preferred.
Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 16:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)