Talk:LIN Media

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Standard logos/branding

The following content was removed from the lead section of the article for LIN-owned

WP:V

.

WDTN's logo is very similar to ones used by KMID, WPRI-TV, and WNAC-TV.

The statement was modified on 25 Febrary 2012 and moved to the "Station slogans" section.

WDTN's logo, with the number "2" placed over a bottom-left to top-right oriented red oval, is much like those used by its sister stations WPRI-TV, which has the number "12" over a similar oval, and WNAC-TV, which has the words "FOX Providence" over a similar oval. Its logo is also similar to that used by unrelated station KMID. There the oval contains a different shade of red, but the font of the number "2" is virtually identical.

This paragraph was also removed.

WDTN, a former Hearst station, had used an identifiable Hearst/Argyle style logo even after the station was sold to Sunrise Television. Upon Sunrise's 2002 merger with LIN TV, the logo was changed to one very similar to today's, but lacking the NBC peacock component, as it was then an ABC affiliate.

LIN stations WPRI-TV and WNAC-TV, both in Providence, RI, use similar logos, and I subsequently found that former LIN station

WAND

in Decatur/Springfield/Champaign/Urbana, IL does as well.

My operating theory is, as former logos are retired, LIN either does or did employ common station branding. Can this theory be proved or disproved? If it was LIN policy, was it only applied to certain stations?

KMID, in Midland/Odessa, TX, has no apparent connection to the LIN stations. Is its similar logo just a coincidence or is it an example of reusing a public domain logo?

If anyone has any insight on this and/or sources proving or disproving, please let me know here. Thanks. --Chaswmsday (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. Cúchullain ^t/c 16:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CBS Television Stations" instead of "CBS TV Stations") , unless it was STRICTLY part of the official name (i.e.: "Local TV"). Under my opinion, the article should be moved to "LIN Media". That is the current DBA name of the company and is highly recognized, after a search of the term on Google. Being the name that LIN calls themselves post-2010, I think it's time that the article be moved to my suggestion. Any questions? CLICK HERE. Thank you! Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 00:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move to Media General when done?

I'd like to propose, once all is said and done, renaming the LIN Media page to Media General, and renaming the current Media General page to something else (Media General (former)?)

They have said this is a merger, essentially. I accept that. It's even more apparent when you notice that Media General will essentially be run by LIN's staff and CEO post-merger. As such, post-merger Media General will be essentially a continuation of LIN, and the old one will cease to exist. Do you think how we handle the merger here should reflect that? ViperSnake151 Talk 00:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100329090957/http://www.allbusiness.com:80/company-activities-management/company-structures-ownership/13145754-1.html to http://www.allbusiness.com/company-activities-management/company-structures-ownership/13145754-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 02:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LIN Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219194453/http://www.mediageneral.com/press/2014/dec19_14_merger.html to http://www.mediageneral.com/press/2014/dec19_14_merger.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]