Talk:Land Rover series

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles High‑importance High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I recently edited the external link section to add a link to our french series community forum and website. Less than a few minutes later, the link had been removed, supposedly for 'ad' reasons. Our goal in offering a link to our website is to propose a link 'over the Channel', to leafers from UK. It can be very helpful for people visiting the wikipedia english page about 'land rover series', to find info, help, assistance, about series in france, especially when planning a trip in our country . Even if our community is less important in France than in UK, more and more events are organised in our country, dedicated to 'series only'. Our 'movement' is growing, and even if our web presence is fairly new, it would have been nice to leave our link. My question : On what basis the links on this very page should be selected ? Regards. Landyleafers (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Landyleafers (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is ambiguous in its references to the WWII Jeep; it reads as though it was just a Jeep with different trim - which it certainly wasn't. I propose removing the following statements:

"...the US-built Willys Jeep, with which it also originally shared many parts"

(A 'citation needed' note has already been placed on the end of that sentence, and as far as I know the Land Rover does not share parts with the Jeep, so that bit needs to go.)

"Originally based on the US Army Jeep the Land Rover was a single model offering"

This is in the Series I section, and I think it just means the Land Rover concept was based on the Jeep, but the article has already made that clear and this sentence simply confuses things. Mr. Bridger (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Originally based on the US Army Jeep

with which it also originally shared many parts

Now done. Mr. Bridger (talk) 11:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious: If this article says these beloved aluminum beasts are commonly called "Series Land Rovers", then why is the title of the article "Land Rover Series" instead of "Series Land Rover"? "Series Land Rover" would make more sense as a title, in my most humble and honest opinion. Eastcote (talk) 05:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen a source claiming AC had "hundreds of Land Rovers aboard". The sources I've seen said she was carrying tentage, helos, material for a temporary strip etc but not Land Rovers. Justin talk 13:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Land Rover 109 Pick-Up 1980.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 25 February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Land Rover 109 Pick-Up 1980.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- talk) 12:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130331011837/http://www.army.mil.nz/our-capability/operational-vehicles/lov.htm to http://www.army.mil.nz/our-capability/operational-vehicles/lov.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the info box claim the Austin Gypsy was a predecessor when it was released in the same year as the SII came out? 86.12.204.16 (talk) 01:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]