Talk:Laser scalpel

Differences

Will lasers ever replace normal scalpels? Because there is an inherent difference in the result of a cut I think. With a scalpel the vessels and such would be unseal, but inevitably with a laser it would be cauterised? Is this ever unwanted? What about in a blood vessel, if you want to re join it after a cut it would be impossible without using a scalpel to cut the ends. Or will alaser strong enough to cut the immediate tissue not nessesarily cauterising the ends? Wolfmankurd 20:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

Laser scalpel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ

for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050114061051/http://www.vanderbilt.edu/News/research/ravf96/ravf96_7.html to http://www.vanderbilt.edu/News/research/ravf96/ravf96_7.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]